Printable Version
Tell a friend
EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT: LABOR'S TOP PRIORITY, BUT ROADBLOCKS REMAIN
Thursday, November 6, 2008(PAI)
EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT: LABOR’S TOP
PRIORITY, BUT ROADBLOCKS REMAIN
By Mark
Gruenberg
PAI Staff Writer
WASHINGTON (PAI)--Passage of the Employee Free Choice Act, to help level the playing field between workers and bosses in union organizing and in bargaining or first contracts, will be labor’s top priority in the new 111th Congress, top AFL-CIO officials said. But roadblocks remain for the legislation.
One big problem will be the U.S. Senate, where workers and their allies did not get the filibuster-proof 60-vote majority they were shooting for. The law, passé by the House in this Congress, was derailed by a Senate filibuster led by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kent.). a virulent Right Winger who won re-election on Nov. 4.
Instead, unionists and their allies gained at least half a dozen seats--not enough to break up the talkathons--with one Senate race, in Georgia, headed for a runoff in December. That’s because Georgia law says a senator must be elected with an absolute majority of the votes, and minor-party candidates prevented anti-worker incumbent Saxby Chambliss (R) or state Rep. Jim Martin (D) from achieving that.
Three other Senate races, including those in Minnesota and Alaska, are still too close to call. So is the question of whether Democratic nominee Barack Obama won Missouri--he leas by 6,000 votes--or North Carolina.
But another problem may be that president-elect Obama and vice-president-elect Joseph Biden, both strong supporters of the Employee Free Choice Act, will have other economic issues on their platter first--and AFL-CIO leaders have not recently discussed EFCA’s provisions and its scheduling with Obama’s team.
“We discussed how to win the election, first,” Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka said after the federation’s post-election news conference on Nov. 5.
The Employee Free Choice Act would help level the playing field between workers and bosses in union organizing and in bargaining initial contracts. It would write into labor law “card check” recognition of unions--a 45-year-old practice where unions are recognized if they sign a majority of covered workers at a site to NLRB election authorization cards.
But that recognition only occurs if the employer agrees, and employers rarely do so, opening the way nasty, vicious anti-union campaigns, featuring labor law-breaking, before the NLRB-run votes. Card check would virtually short-circuit such campaigns.
The Employee Free
Choice Act would also sharply increase
penalties, to $20,000 per violation, for labor
law-breaking. It would make it easier to
get court orders against labor
lawbreakers. And it would mandate binding
arbitration between unions and bosses if they
cannot reach an initial contract within 120
days of starting talks.
Trumka, AFL-CIO
President John J. Sweeney and other union
speakers emphasized the situation would change
for the law just because two of its supporters
will be in the White House, as opposed to
anti-worker GOP President George W. Bush, who
hates it, and unions.
“For the first time in eight years, we have a president who supports workers’ rights,” federation Political Director Karen Ackerman added.
“We must
counterbalance corporate power. The gap
between the wealthy and everyone else has grown
from a gulf to a chasm under Bush,” Sweeney
said. “We
cannot rebuild the middle
class and ensure that economic growth is shared
unless we give working people back the freedom
to improve their lives through unions and
bargain for better wages and benefits.
“Workers in unions, after all, make 30% more than those without a union and there are much more likely to have benefits. And so our top priority is passage of the Employee Free Choice Act, legislation that will restore workers’ freedom to bargain for a better life. In an economy that gives corporations too much power, a union card remains the single best ticket into the middle class,” Sweeney added.
But under questioning, Sweeney had no schedule for its consideration in the new Congress. “We don’t have final races on all congressional races yet. And we’ll be strategizing about it based on that situation,” he said. He also admitted “we have to see what the final results are from the Senate.”
“We’re a lot closer to passing it than we were before the election, because candidates up and down the ballot supported it,” added Legislative Director Bill Samuel.
Trumka said that every possible way to get the legislation through Congress will be on the table. The Chamber of Commerce and other business groups spent a combined $60 million in an anti-EFCA drive, focused on key and close Senate races, in the 2008 campaign’s homestretch. They have already made stopping it their top priority
“There are an infinite
number of strategies to get it passed and each
one of them will have our complete
attention,” Trumka said.
###
